With automakers scrambling to establish their clean-diesel
credentials it is becoming increasingly difficult to keep track of
OEM technology choices and plans. The US market is the most
fragmented, with two levels of legislation currently in force:
CARB's LEV II scheme enforced in California, Maine, Massachusetts,
New York and Vermont, and the EPA's less stringent Tier II scheme
in place in the remaining 45 states. Currently, the EPA's Tier II
scheme requires that a manufacturer's inventory emissions average
Bin 5 limits of 0.07g/mile NOx. The Tier II legislation will be
fully implemented by 2009 with the removal of bins 9-11 across all
models. California's LEV II scheme requires that all passenger car
emissions are limited to Bin 5 limits. Therefore, automakers are
able to produce 45-state or 50-state compliant diesel cars. The
technology pathways available to manufacturers add to the
confusion, with in-engine technologies alongside a myriad of
aftertreatment options: DPFs, oxycats, SCR systems, LNTs and NOx
absorbers.
Routes to compliance
The main division in diesel emissions control strategy is between
the European and Japanese OEMs. European OEMs entered 2007-model,
clean-diesel passenger cars into the US market using DPFs and LNTs
to reduce emissions in line with the 45-state limits. Prior to the
launch of the 2007 model ranges, the BlueTec co-operative
(DaimlerChrysler, Volkswagen and Audi) formed to jointly market
European light-duty diesel in the US. Vehicles produced under the
BlueTec mark will use common emissions control technology. The 2007
entries were followed by announcements of 50-state compliant,
2008-model passenger cars using urea-SCR. BMW has been reluctant to
work with other German OEMs as part of BlueTec and is currently
pursuing a similar technology pathway with its own branding and
marketing. To date, German automakers are the only European
companies to pursue clean diesel technology for US applications;
the costs involved limit its use to the premium and SUV
markets.
Japanese OEMs have selected an alternative strategy. By focusing on
engine and NOx absorber technology, they hope to achieve 50-state
compliance no later than 2009/10. The absorber captures NOx and
converts a portion of it to ammonia, which can be used in a
downstream SCR catalyst to reduce NOx without the need for urea
solution. The strategy pursued by the Japanese OEMs precludes the
development of 45-state vehicles and the use of urea-SCR.
Therefore, technology lead times will prevent Japanese automakers
from entering the US diesel market for some time yet. Toyota has
enlisted the diesel know-how of Isuzu with the purchase of a 5.9%
stake. This investment is part of Toyota's plan to penetrate the
European and US diesel markets. Honda has announced 50-State
compliant diesel versions of its Accord, Odyssey, Pilot and
Ridgeline by 2010. Nissan has plans for a clean-diesel version of
its Maxima, and Subaru is working on a diesel Tribeca.
US manufacturers, traditionally resistant to diesel, have been slow
to invest in new compression engine technology (possibly hampered
by 2006 losses). However, Ford's participation in the Urea
Stakeholders Group suggests that it is planning for diesel, and
will favour SCR to achieve Tier II Bin 5 compliance. In June GM
announced plans to develop an SCR 50-State compliant version of its
V8 Duramax diesel engine for use in heavier pick-up models.
Market share
Political shifts in the US have led to greater pressure on the
administration to curb carbon emissions and reduce America's demand
for foreign oil. This, coupled with an increasing number of States
seeking to independently set CO2 limits - despite the Presidents
official refusal to limit CO2 (for fear of damaging the economy) -
has dramatically increased the interest in fuel efficient diesel
engines.
Leading automotive consultants and analysts have now predicted that
by 2015 the light-duty diesel market share in the US will exceed
hybrid vehicle share. Automotive forecaster, JD Power, has
predicted US light-duty diesel market share to reach more than 10%
by 2015, an increase of over 200% when compared to today's 3.2%. In
fact, a recent report by Ricardo has highlighted the decrease in
demand for hybrids, and predicted that diesel demand will soon
outstrip demand for hybrid vehicles. This is based upon a
comparison of clean-diesel and hybrid-electric cost premiums and
fuel efficiencies. Although both technologies achieve similar fuel
economies, the hybrid technology price premium is twice that of
clean diesel.
The future
The future growth of the US diesel market is certain. Manufacturers
have made huge investments in decreasing harmful emissions, and are
ploughing millions into re-branding the unloved fuel. The level of
investment in US diesel has attracted the attention of analysts at
large investment banks and brokerages, who have given 'buy' ratings
to OE and component manufacturers with links to diesel - further
increasing the hype surrounding clean-diesel.
OEMs are already considering the next step, combining the diesel
engine with hybrid technology. The combination of these two
technologies would increase fuel efficiency beyond anything
possible today. Toyota is jointly working on clean-diesel engines
with Isuzu, and is considering pursuing a diesel-electric hybrid.
DaimlerChrysler will complete its diesel-electric hybrid bus
prototype this year and is looking at other applications. Peugeot
has announced a diesel-electric hybrid version of its 308. However,
cost premiums for these efficient vehicles will be high.























